Thursday 26 October 2017



Non Appointment of Company Secretary – NCLT Levied Penalty

Case: In the matter of Atyati Technologies Pvt Ltd.

NCLT Bench: Bengaluru Bench

Applicant -   
1.      Atyati Technologies Pvt Ltd – Company.
2.      Mr. Prakash Ramchandra Prabhu- CEO and Director.

Violations:
Provisions of sections 203 of the companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 8A of companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personals) Rule,2014.

Section 203-  Appointment of Key Managerial Personnel:
(1)    Every company belonging to such class or classes of companies as may be prescribed shall have the following whole-time key managerial personnel,—

(i)                 managing director, or Chief Executive Officer or manager and in their absence, a whole-time director;
(ii)               company secretary; and
(iii)             Chief Financial Officer…………….
(2)…………
(3)………….
(4)…………
(5) If a company contravenes the provisions of this section, the company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees and every director and key managerial personnel of the company who is in default shall be punishable with fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees and where the contravention is a continuing one, with a further fine which may extend to one thousand rupees for every day after the first during which the contravention continues.

Rule 8 - Appointment of Key Managerial Personnel:
Every listed company and every other public company having a paid-up share capital of ten crore rupees or more shall have whole-time key managerial personnel.

Rule 8A - Appointment of Company Secretaries in Companies Not Covered above:
A company other than a company covered under rule 8 which has a paid up share capital of five crore rupees or more shall have a whole-time company secretary.

Default: Company failed to appoint its full time Company secretary.

Period of violation:  Period of default- From 9th June, 2014 (i.e. from the date on which Rule 8A notified) to 30th September, 2016 (845 Days).

Maximum Fine as per sections:

·         For Company- Maximum Fine Rupees 5,00,000/- (Fixed payable)
                      If continuing default Rupees 1,000/- every day.

·         For Every Director and KMP in default- Maximum Fine Rupees 50,000/- (Fixed payable)
                                                        If continuing default Rupees 1,000/- every day.


Facts considered while passing Order:
·         Company has failed to appoint its full time company secretary as required under section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013, although Companies has a capital of more than 5 crore rupees.
·         The reason for non-appointment of CS was that, non-availability of suitable candidate for the position as no one was interested in joining, because the exposure in Company was minimal.
·         The applicants made suo-moto application for compounding of violation.
·         However, company made the default good by appointing Ms. Shruti Gupta, as CS in Board meeting dated 29th September, 2016 and filed DIR 12 for the same.
·         Company contended that, violation was neither deliberate nor intentional and it was due to reasons which were beyond control of the applicants.

Conclusion:
Tribunal compounded offence under section 203 of the Companies act 2013 by levying compounding fees payable within 15 days from the date of order.
Calculation as follows:

Applicants
Fixed payables (Rupees)
Continuing default Per day (Rupees)
Total Fees levied (rupees)
Maximum
Actual
Maximum
Actual
Actual
Atyati Technologies Pvt Ltd -Company
5,00,000
1,50,000
845X1000=
8,45,000
845X100=
84,500
2,34,500/-
Mr. Prakash Ramchandra Prabhu- CEO and Director
50,000
20,000
845X1000=
8,45,000
845X100=
84,500
1,04,500/-
Total




3,39,000/-



SUCCESS STORY IV – Bella Casa Fashion & Retail Limited

Today we are sharing success story No. IV of Bella Casa Fashion & Retail Limited.

Bella Casa Fashion & Retail Limited Came out with an IPO on 28th September, 2015.

Bella Casa Fashion & Retail Limited came out with an IPO on SME platform with a vision to create big valuation and visibility.

Company’s profits at the time of listing were Rs. 0.38 Cr. were as for financial year 2016-17 it’s around Rs. 3.27 Cr. but Market Cap. is Rs. 122.60 Cr.

Bella Casa Fashion & Retail Limited came into light when the Girik Wealth Advisors acquired 8% shares of the Company.

The issue price of the company was Rs. 14/- and current market price as on 24th October, 2017 is Rs. 205/-. It means price has grown 1,364% on issue price.

*This Write up is dated 24th October, 2017


Tuesday 24 October 2017


NCLT ordered Restoration from the Date of Strike off

Case: Narendra Popatlal Barhate v. Registrar of Companies, Pune

NCLT Bench: Mumbai Bench

Struck off by: ROC, Pune

Grounds for striking off by ROC:
Not carrying on business or not into Operation under Section 248(1)&(2).
     
Application of Restoration
Appeal Filed by Shareholders of the company under section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 to restore the name of the company from the date of strike off and treat the company as if it had never been struck off and to enable the company to continue to function as an operating company and be given 2 months’ time to file the Financial Statements and Annual Returns as on 31.03.2016.

Facts of the case:
·         The ROC, Pune issued a notice pursuant to Section 248(1) and (2) of the Companies Act, 2013 to the company intending to remove the name of the company from Register of companies. (11/03/2017)
·         The company has given a reply stating company is active and doing business, however due to sheer inadvertence, the filing of the company is pending which will be completed within a period of 30 days. (23/03/2017)
·         Despite reply ROC issued Notice in STK-5 (07/04/2017) and STK5A (27/04/2017)
·         Meantime, the company has filed the financial statement for the financial year ended 31.03.2015 and informed the same to ROC (10/05/2017)
·         ROC struck off the name of the company and published the same in official gazette (22/07/2017)
·         As the name of the company was struck off, the company was unable to file financial statements for financial year ended 31.03.2016, though it was ready to file.

Evidence submitted by Company as a proof of Company is carrying on business:
·         List of employees about 38 in numbers
·         Various purchase order
·         Bank Statements of 2 Bank Accounts from Jan-17 to June-17.
·         Copy of Registration under Shop & Establishments, Act.
·         Invoices Raised by company Jan - Aug 17     
·         Service Tax returns  Jan - Aug 17
·         TDS returns Jan - Aug 17
·         Software instalment  basis Jan - Aug 17         
·         Salary statement and Instruction to banker to credit the salary to employees account. Jan - Aug 17
·         Electricity Bills  Jan - Aug 17
·         Telephone Bill Jan - Aug 17


Order passed:
NCLT bench taken view that, the Company was in existence and it is a going concern and hence, directed ROC, Pune to restore the name of the company from the date of strike off of the company and treat the company as if it has never been struck off.


Wednesday 4 October 2017

SUCCESS STORY II – TIGER LOGISTICS (INDIA) LIMITED

Today we are sharing success story No. II of Tiger Logistics (India) Limited.

Tiger logistics (India) Ltd. came out with an IPO on SME platform with a vision to create big valuation and visibility.

The Profit of the Company at the time of Listing was Rs. 3.39 Crores. . As per financials of 2016-17 it is around 10.29 crores. 

Tiger Logistics (India) Ltd. came into lime light when the logistics sector was booming. Investments flowed in the Company as SME have the high growth potential.

The company gave a return of 450% which was on a higher side compared to its main board listed competitor Gati with a return of 400% during the same period.

Following table indicates now companies’ profits and valuation of promoter stakes have increased over a period of last 3 - 4 years.

Year
Turnover ( in crores)
Profit After Tax ( in crores)
Highest Price Per share()
Promoters stake (No. of shares)
Wealth ( In crore)
2013-14
147.48
                              3.92
200.15
30,87,000
                                  61.79
2014-15
                              245.82
                              5.78
375.00
30,87,000
115.76
2015-16
                              253.45
                              7.30
299.00
77,17,500
                                  230.75
2016-17
                              298.05
                              10.29
304.00
77,17,500
                                234.61

*This Write up is dated 3rd October, 2017


Tuesday 3 October 2017




Deferment of implementation of Circular dated 4th August, 2017

SEBI had, vide circular no. CIR/CFD/CMD/93/2017 dated 4th August, 2017, issued guidelines for listed entities with respect to making disclosures about defaults on payment or repayment of principal amount on loans from banks or financial institutions, debt securities.

SEBI had stated in that circular that disclosures shall be made to stock exchanges when a listed entity has defaulted in payment of interest or instalment obligations on debt securities, Medium Term Notes (MTNs), Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs), loans from banks and financial institutions, External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs).

SEBI had provided a list of disclosures which the listed entities were required to provide in that circular.

This circular was going to effective from 1st October, 2017.

However, SEBI vide press release no. PR No.59/2017 dated 29/09/2017 has deferred the implementation of the above mentioned circular until further notice.

Copy of the circular dated 04/08/2017 can be downloaded from the following link:

Copy of the press release dated 29/09/2017 deferring the implementation of the circular can be downloaded from the following link: