Thursday 22 March 2018


 Exemption to open offer
SEBI has released informal guidance to Navkar Builders Limited (NBL) under the Informal Guidance Scheme read with SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 (SEBI (SAST) Regulations 2011) whereby NBL has sought exemption from the obligation to make open offer under Regulation 3 and 4 of SEBI SAST Regulations.

Facts of the case are as follows:

·         Navkar Builders Limited (NBL) is listed on BSE.
·         Promoters of NBL are Mr. Dakshesh Shah, Mr. Samir Patel and Navkar Fiscal Services Pvt. Ltd.
·         Shareholding pattern of NBL is filed with BSE and the names of these promoters are mentioned in the shareholding pattern for more than 3 years.
·         Two transactions have been proposed by NBL.

·         First transaction:
o   Navkar Fiscal Services Private Limited [hereinafter referred as NFSPL] (holding 28.82% shareholding) proposes to acquire shares  of NBL from Mr. Samir Patel.(holding 4.46% shareholding)
o   After the execution of transaction, shareholding of NFSPL will increase from 28.82% to 33.29% in NBL
o   The transferor and transferee have been named as the promoters of NBL for more than 3 years prior to the proposed acquisition

·         Second Transaction:
o   Mr. Dakshesh Shah and Mr. Samir Patel are the promoters ofNFSPL .
o   Out of the total 7,65,020 shares held by Mr. Samir Patel, he proposes to transfer 7,57,300 shares to Mr. Dakshesh Shah and remaining 7,720 shares to Mrs. Shital Dakshesh Shah
o   After the execution of the transaction, shareholding of Mr. Dakshesh Shah will be 99.50% and that of Shital Shah will be 0.50%

NBL has raised query that whether the above mentioned two transactions will be exempt under Regulation 10(1)(a) of SEBI SAST Regulations from the obligation to make open offer under Regulation 3 and 4 of SEBI SAST Regulations

Regulation 10(1)(a) of SEBI SAST Regulations states that:
Regulation 10(1):

The following acquisitions shall be exempt from the obligation to make an open offer under regulation 3 and regulation 4 subject to fulfilment of the conditions stipulated therefor,—

(a) acquisition pursuant to inter se transfer of shares amongst qualifying persons, being,—

    (i) immediate relatives;
   (ii) persons named as promoters in the shareholding pattern filed by the target company in terms of the listing agreement or these regulations for not less than three years prior to the proposed acquisition;
 (iii) a company, its subsidiaries, its holding company, other subsidiaries of such holding company, persons holding not less than fifty per cent of the equity shares of such company, other companies in which such persons hold not less than fifty per cent of the equity shares, and their subsidiaries subject to control over such qualifying persons being exclusively held by the same persons;
 (iv) persons acting in concert for not less than three years prior to the proposed acquisition,  and disclosed as such pursuant to filings under the listing agreement;
(v) shareholders of a target company who have been persons acting in concert for a period of not less than three years prior to the proposed acquisition and are disclosed as such pursuant to filings under the listing agreement, and any company in which the entire equity share capital is owned by such shareholders in the same proportion as their holdings in the target company without any differential entitlement to exercise voting rights in such company:

Provided that for purposes of availing of the exemption under this clause,—

(i) If the shares of the target company are frequently traded, the acquisition price per share shall not be higher by more than twenty-five per cent of the volume-weighted average market price for a period of sixty trading days preceding the date of issuance of notice for the proposed inter se transfer under sub-regulation (5), as traded on the stock exchange where the maximum volume of trading in the shares of the target company are recorded during such period, and if the shares of the target company are infrequently traded, the acquisition price shall not be higher by more than twenty-five percent of the price determined in terms of clause (e) of sub-regulation (2) of regulation 8; and
(ii) the transferor and the transferee shall have complied with applicable disclosure requirements set out in Chapter V.

SEBI has stated that the first transaction is between two promoters whose names occur in the shareholding pattern for more than 3 years and the shareholding pattern have been filed with SEBI. Hence it is eligible for exemption under Regulation 10(1)(a)(ii) from open offer under Regulation 3 and 4 subject to compliance with Regulation 10 of Takeover Regulations, 2011
However, in case of second transaction, it is also between two promoters. But, the shareholding pattern of NFSPL is not disclosed on stock exchanges.
Further, post share transfer,  Mr. Dakshesh Shah will have the entire shareholding/control in NFSPL.This would result in indirect acquisition of shares by Mr. Dakshesh Shah in NBL through NFSPL. ..

The indirect acquisition of shares through inter se transfer of shares of promoter entity doesn’t fall under the exemption. Hence, second transaction is not exempt under Regulation 10(1)(a)(ii) from obligation to make open offer under Regulation 3 and 4

Tuesday 20 March 2018



12 Companies from the LOGISTIC sector raise 117.68 crores

Logistics, Shipping, Transportation etc. are among the flourishing sectors in India. The same is also reflected in the IPO market.

In the last two years, 12 Companies* in the logistics sector have raised total funds of ₹117.68 Crores by way of IPO.

 Total market capitalization of these companies is ₹1119.94 Crores

Highest profit earned, in this sector, of ₹5.12 Crores is by Maheshwari Logistics Limited.   

Total Transport Systems Ltd. came out with an IPO with an issue size of ₹17 Crores and the issue was oversubscribed by 20.17 times which is a record in itself
Recently, Tara Chand Logistic Solutions Ltd came out with an IPO with an issue size of ₹20.46 Crores

To sum up, companies from the logistics sector have great scope to raise funds via IPO. This is an opportune time for such companies to unlock value by coming out with an IPO.


*This write up is dated 8th March, 2018


Thursday 8 March 2018



Compensation to Retail Individual Investors in an IPO
SEBI vide circular dated 15th February, 2018 has directed that investors will be compensated by Self Certified Syndicate Banks (SCSBs) if the investors fail to get allotment of specified securities in an IPO.

Opportunity loss is faced by the investors due to factors such as failure on the part of SCSBs to make bids to concerned stock exchanges even after the amount has been blocked in the investor’s bank account, to process ASBA applications even if they have been submitted on time or any other failure by SCSB which led to rejection of form. With this circular the issue with respect to opportunity loss faced by the investors due to non-allotment of securities, has now been resolved.

If in an IPO, investor fails to get allotment of securities and in the process suffer any opportunity loss, he shall be compensated by SCSB for the loss suffered.

Companies should not have any concern with this circular because the compensation is payable by the SCSBs for the fault on their part.

SEBI has decided to design a uniform policy for the calculation of minimum compensation payable to investors in case of loss suffered. In the circular SEBI has proposed a formula for calculating minimum compensation.

Highlights of the circular:

  •  Any applicant whose application has not been considered for allotment, due to failure on the part of the SCSB, shall have the option to seek redressal of the same within three months of the listing date with the concerned SCSB.
  • · On receipt of such application/s, the SCSB would be required to resolve the same within 15   days  otherwise they will have to pay an interest at 15% p.a. for any delay
  •  In case the SCSBs fail to redress such grievances within the stipulated time, additionally SEBI may initiate action as deemed fit.
  •   In case of issues which are not oversubscribed the applicants would be compensated for all the shares which they would have been allotted.


·         No compensation would be payable to the applicant if the listing price is below the issue price.
This circular shall come into force with immediate effect.

The circular can be downloaded from the following link:





Manner of achieving minimum public shareholding
SEBI vide circular dated 22nd February, 2018 has prescribed additional methods to facilitate listed entities to comply with the minimum public shareholding requirements. Following are the two additional methods:

·         Open Market sale: Promoter/promoter group can sell shares upto 2% of the paid up equity share capital subject to five times average monthly trading volume of shares

With respect to sale of shares in the open market, SEBI has prescribed following conditions:
The listed entity shall:

1.      have to give the following details to the stock exchanges, one trading day prior to sale of shares:
Ø Intention of the promoter/promoter group to sell the shares and also the purpose of shares
Ø Details of the promoter/promoter group who propose to divest their shareholding
Ø Period within which the divestment process will be completed
Ø Total no. of shares and the % shareholding proposed to be divested

2.      Provide an undertaking to stock exchanges from promoter/promoter group stating that they shall not buy any shares in the open market on the dates on which the shares are being sold by promoter(s)/promoter group
3.      Shall ensure compliance with all the legal provisions including SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 and SEBI (SAST) Regulations, 2011

·       Qualified Institutional Placements (QIPs): Allotment of eligible securities through QIPs in terms of Chapter VIII of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009.

The circular shall supersede the circular CIR/CFD/CMD/14/2015 dated November 30, 2015
The circular can be downloaded from the following link:



Lot of companies from smaller cities have gone for IPO
In the recent past many companies from small parts of India have come out with an IPO.
Listing of the company is not totally dependent upon the type of business of the company or the city where it belongs to. It is also dependent upon the vision of the owner.
Companies from small parts of India can also get listed.
Following table shows the companies belonging to small cities which have come out with an IPO in the recent years:

Sr. No.
Company
City
Date of listing
Issue Size
1.
CHD Chemicals Limited
Chandigarh
01/04/2016
1.98 Cr.
2.
Aditya Consumer Marketing Limited
Patna
17/10/2016
6.00 Cr.
3.
Dynamic Cables Limited
Jaipur
14/12/2017
23.38 Cr.
4.
Vadivarhe Speciality Chemicals Limited
Nashik
02/06/2017
14.46 Cr.
5.
Angel Fibers Limited
Ahmadabad
06/03/2018
18.22 Cr.
6.
Sarveshwar Foods Limited
Jammu
Issue Open: 05/03/2018
Issue Close: 07/03/2018
54.97 Cr.
7.
South West Pinnacle Exploration Ltd.
Gurgaon
19/02/2018
35.86 Cr.
8.
Macpower CNC Machines Ltd.
Rajkot
Issue Open: 12/03/2018
Issue Close: 14/03/2018
36.61 Cr.
9.
Inflame Appliances Ltd.
Solan
Issue Open: 06/03/2018
Issue Close: 08/03/2018
6.48 Cr.

Conclusion:
Thus, from the above information one can conclude that business gets listed from small cities as well. It is not necessary that the companies should belong to any metropolitan cities to get listed.